Difference Between Canon M50 Mark II and Fujifilm X-Pro 3. Comparison

The Canon M50 Mark II and Fujifilm X-Pro 3 are mirrorless cameras offering a range of features for photographers and videographers. However, the cameras have different strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on individual needs and preferences.

#	Image	Details
1		Canon EOS M50 Mark II	Amazon.com
2		Fujifilm X-Pro3	Amazon.com

Canon M50 Mark II

24MP – APS-C CMOS Sensor
ISO 100 – 25600( expands to 51200)
3.00″ Fully Articulated Screen
2360k dot Electronic viewfinder
10.0fps continuous shooting
4K at 30fps and FHD at 60fps Video Recording
Built-in Wireless
387g. 116 x 88 x 59 mm

Fujifilm X-Pro 3

26MP – APS-C BSI-CMOS Sensor
No Optical low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter
ISO 160 – 12800( expands to 80 – 51200)
3.00″ Tilting Screen
3690k dot Electronic and Optical (tunnel) viewfinder
20.0fps continuous shooting
4K at 30fps and FHD at 120fps Video Recording
Built-in Wireless
497g. 141 x 83 x 46 mm

Design

The Canon M50 Mark II has a classic mirrorless design, a small and lightweight body, and a fully articulating touchscreen LCD. On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-Pro 3 has a more traditional rangefinder-style design, with a larger and more solid build and a unique hybrid viewfinder. The X-Pro 3 also has a durable titanium construction and a hidden LCD screen, which can be flipped up.

Image Quality

Both cameras use APS-C size image sensors, with the Canon M50 Mark II using a 24.1-megapixel CMOS sensor and the Fujifilm X-Pro 3 using a 26.1-megapixel X-Trans CMOS IV sensor.

The X-Pro 3’s X-Trans sensor uses a unique random pattern filter instead of a standard optical low-pass filter, which can result in improved sharpness and reduced more. However, this advantage may not be noticeable in real-world shooting.

Autofocus

The Canon M50 Mark II has a Dual Pixel CMOS AF system with 143 autofocus points, which provides quick and accurate autofocus for both stills and videos. On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-Pro 3 uses a contrast-detection autofocus system, which can be slower and less reliable than phase-detection autofocus.

Video Capabilities

The Canon M50 Mark II has strong video capabilities, supporting 4K/24p and full HD recording up to 60 fps. It also has built-in image stabilization, which can help to reduce camera shake while recording. In contrast, the Fujifilm X-Pro 3 only supports full HD recording at up to 60 fps and does not have built-in image stabilization.

Continuous Shooting Speed

The Canon M50 Mark II has a continuous shooting speed of up to 14 fps with AF tracking and up to 10 fps with the mechanical shutter. On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-Pro 3 has a constant shooting speed of up to 11 fps with the mechanical shutter, which is slower than the M50 Mark II.

Battery Life

The Canon M50 Mark II has a battery life of 235 shots, while the Fujifilm X-Pro 3 has a battery life of 390. This means that the X-Pro 3 has a longer battery life, essential for photographers who frequently shoot without a power source.

User Interface

The Canon M50 Mark II has a straightforward user interface, with easy access to settings and functions. The Fujifilm X-Pro 3, on the other hand, has a more traditional interface, with physical controls for exposure settings and a unique hybrid viewfinder that allows users to switch between an optical viewfinder and an electronic viewfinder.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Canon M50 Mark II and Fujifilm X-Pro 3 have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on individual needs and preferences. The M50 Mark II is a good choice for videographers and photographers who prioritize recording and compact design. At the same time, the X-Pro 3 is a good choice for still photographers who prefer a traditional rangefinder-style method and a longer battery life.

Read More: