Is Canon M50 Mark II good for Videography?

Roy

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II is suitable for videography or vlogging. Because it’s small and light, you can easily transport it when vlogging. Moreover, with a thoroughly articulating screen, you can conveniently frame yourself and watch the video.

The lack of in-body image stabilization is disappointing, but a digital stabilizing capability can be used, although at the cost of increased cropping. In Full HD, the camera’s kit lens performs an excellent job of ironing out the camera shake.

In FHD, it also has superb focusing performance, but in 4K, it performs substantially worse in image stabilization and autofocus. In FHD, the video quality is average, and in 4K, it’s abysmal. However, it includes a built-in streaming feature, which has drawbacks.

For studio video, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is adequate. It contains a microphone jack and a mini HDMI connector, among other inputs. As a result, it offers clean HDMI output when utilizing an external recorder and doesn’t want any overlays.

In addition, the menu system is simple to use, with all of the settings and video options clearly put out. Despite this, the overall quality of the video is unimpressive, and its 4k video capabilities and features are notably weak.

The Canon EOS M50 Mark II isn’t the best choice for action videos.

Read More:

Bagikan:

[addtoany]

Roy

Leave a Comment